On Wed, Dec 02 2015, Alan Lawrence wrote: [...]
> Since this, we've been seeing these tests fail natively on AArch64 and ARM: > > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 gcov: 3 failures in line > counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in > intermediate format > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 115: is 27:should be 14 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 58: is 18:should be 9 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++11 line 73: is 162:should be 81 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 gcov: 3 failures in line > counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in > intermediate format > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 115: is 27:should be 14 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 58: is 18:should be 9 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++14 line 73: is 162:should be 81 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 gcov: 3 failures in line > counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages, 0 in > intermediate format > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 115: is 27:should be 14 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 58: is 18:should be 9 > FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C -std=gnu++98 line 73: is 162:should be 81 Right, sorry about that. See also: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603 This should be fixed now. Let me know if you still see problems. -- Andreas
