On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: > On 12/04/15 13:28, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >>>> >>>> +2015-12-04 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> >>>> + >>>> + * sancov.c: New file. >>>> + * Makefile.in (OBJS): Add sancov.o. >>>> + * invoke.texi (-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc): Describe. >>>> + * passes.def (sancov_pass): Add. >>>> + * tree-pass.h (sancov_pass): Add. >>>> + * common.opt (-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc): Add. >>>> + * sanitizer.def (BUILT_IN_SANITIZER_COV_TRACE_PC): Add. >>>> + * builtins.def (DEF_SANITIZER_BUILTIN): Enable for >>>> + flag_sanitize_coverage. >>> >>> >>> This is ok for trunk. >> >> >> >> Committed as 231296 > > > This seems to have changed the testsuite (gcc.dg/sancov) without record in > testsuite/ChangeLog. Further, the tests presume sanitizer coverage is > implemented. I'm seeing asan.c fail with: > > cc1: warning: -fsanitize=address and -fsanitize=kernel-address are not > supported for this target > > cc1: warning: -fsanitize=address not supported for this target > > output is: > cc1: warning: -fsanitize=address and -fsanitize=kernel-address are not > supported for this target > > cc1: warning: -fsanitize=address not supported for this target > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/sancov/asan.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
Mailed a fix titled "[PATCH] Fix new sancov tests". Sorry for the breakage.
