On 14/12/15 09:58 -0800, Tim Shen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't fully understand the patch, but it's OK for trunk, and if
you're confident it's definitely correct and safe it's OK for the
gcc-5 and gcc-4_9 branches too.
Was it just completely wrong before, creating a vector of
default-constructed match results, that were not matched?
Yes, that's the case. I'm not sure why I missed this. Perhaps all I
was focusing on is to get the captures in the lookahead sub-expression
out of it, so later user can use it; but I didn't think about the
other way around.
OK then I do understand it and it's definitely OK to commit :-)
Thanks.
