On Tue, 2015-12-15 10:43:58 -0700, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/2015 01:07 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> >On Mon, 2015-12-14 18:54:28 +0000, Moore, Catherine 
> ><catherine_mo...@mentor.com> wrote:
> >>>avr-rtems          
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478544
> >>>mipsel-elf         
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478844
> >>>mipsisa64r2-sde-elf        
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478855
> >>>mipsisa64sb1-elf   
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478865
> >>>mips-rtems         
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478877
> >>>powerpc-eabialtivec        
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478922
> >>>powerpc-eabispe    
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478932
> >>>powerpc-rtems      
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478956
> >>>ppc-elf            
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=478968
> >>>sh-superh-elf      
> >>>http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=479077
> >>
> >>Is there an easy way to reproduce the MIPS problems that you
> >>reported?  I don't seem to be able to do it with a cross-compiler
> >>targeting mipsel-elf.
> >
> >What's your build compiler? For these builds, where it showed up, I'm
> >using a freshly compiles HEAD/master version. So basically, compile a
> >current GCC for your build machine:
> Right.  This is something that only shows up when using the trunk to build
> the crosses.
> 
> When I looked, I thought I bisected it to the delayed folding work.

Shall I bisect one of the cases anew, with the "Test value of
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_WCHAR not whether it is defined" patch that uncovered
it, applied? Starting with some arbitrary old revision?

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbg...@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:          GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
the second  :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to