Hi, On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > This patch exposes a problem in libada. But I'd still be interested > > if it fixes the spu problem. > > It turns out that the patch not only fixes the pr49771 failure, but in > fact *all* outstanding vectorizer test case failures on SPU in both > mainline and the 4.6 branch: > > While I'm still somewhat concerned about potential performance > regressions, correctness is of course more important, so I'd really like > to see your patch (or something along its lines) go in ... > > Are there any updates on the libada problem or other reasons why the > patch cannot go in? Nope, I've solved that one. Letme update it. Ciao, Michael.