On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:02:23AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:59 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> >> > wrote: >> >> I have committed the following patch to trunk. I am planning to commit it >> >> to the gcc5 branch and close the PR as FIXED next sunday if there is no >> >> objection. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> Dominique >> >> >> >> Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog >> >> =================================================================== >> >> --- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 232126) >> >> +++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy) >> >> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ >> >> +2016-01-07 Dominique d'Humieres <domi...@lps.ens.fr> >> >> + >> >> + PR fortran/66680 >> >> + gfortran.dg/gomp/pr66680.f90: New test. >> >> + >> >> 2016-01-07 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> >> >> >> >> PR target/69171 >> > >> > I got >> > >> > gfortran: error: libgomp.spec: No such file or directory^M >> > >> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/pr66680.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) >> > >> >> Shouldn't gomp run-time test be in libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran? > > Of course. Patch to move it there preapproved. > > Jakub
Done. -- H.J.
