On 01/08/2016 03:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:33:51PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote:
We are emitting a bogus warning for the code
do foo (0); while (flagA);
^--- NEXT
^------------ BODY
^--------------- GUARD
In general I don't think we can get any useful indentation warning out
of a do-while statement, so this patch makes it so that we just skip
them.
Not even say for
do
foo (0);
while (flagA);
etc.? Though, not sure if c-indentation.c wants to warn about those.
That's considered "bad" indentation, but not misleading indentation
because it's not implying something is being guarded that isn't actually
being guarded.
jeff
