On 01/07/2016 10:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
I did have one idea though - we could change the name of the function
being tested from one that might not exist (__fread_chk) to one that
definitely should exist (eg malloc).
Not a bad idea.
Does it make sense to just limit this test to specific platforms,
perhaps just x86/i686 linux for now.
68913 mentions ppc64-linux fails,
it'd be nice to know why since I'd expect that has the _chk symbols.
Actually 68913 references any Solaris target, not ppc64-linux.
It was in one of the comments. A. Schwab did some poking and can't find
evidence of ppc64-linux failing though -- I suspect it was a user error
of some sort.
Jeff
