On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:39:29AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> GCC 5 has the same issue. This patch should be backported to GCC 5 >> with >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00528.html >> >> which supersedes: >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=231269 >> >> OK to backport Jakub's and my patch for GCC 5? > > I think I'd prefer just r231269 and my patch for the branch, to make the > changes as small as possible, leave the cleanup on the trunk only. > But, I'm not x86_64 maintainer, so I'll leave that decision to Uros/Kirill.
I agree with Jakub. Those two patches are OK for backport. Thanks, Uros.