In r230167 I made this testcase be tested on 64-bit as well, since it
now works. That was a tad optimistic for powerpc64le though. For now,
XFAIL it there.
Is this okay for trunk? Tested the testcase manually on powerpc64-linux
and powerpc64le-linux (that is, I ran "make check-gcc-c -k
RUNTESTFLAGS=powerpc.exp=20050603-3.c").
Segher
gcc/testsuite/
2016-01-14 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
PR target/68803
* gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c: Add xfails for powerpc64le.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
index 4017d34..1884241 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
@@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ void rotins (unsigned int x)
b.y = (x<<12) | (x>>20);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} } } */
+/* The XFAILs are PR68803. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} { xfail powerpc64le-*-* } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrldic} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrot[lr]} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\ms[lr][wd]} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrl[wd]imi} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrl[wd]imi} 1 { xfail powerpc64le-*-* }
} } */
--
1.9.3
