On 01/05/2016 04:30 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
It doesn't look to me like DW_AT_endianity is applicable to array types
or members in DWARF 3/4; instead, it should be applied to the underlying
base type.

OK, the attached patch does that so is more invasive as expected.

Please document the reverse parameter to modified_type_die. OK with that change.

Jason


Reply via email to