On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote: > The attached patch adds a test for the apparently long fixed > bug. > > FWIW, I've been trying to close out some of these old bugs and > while it doesn't seem to be done consistently, it occurs to me > that it might be nice to add tests for them. Please let me > know if you don't think it's worth the trouble (not just mine > but also reviewing the tests and maintaining them).
Assuming this passes, the additional test is okay. Thanks, David
