On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:40:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Another patch reducing the accuracy required in the bessel_6 test.

Fixes the test case for S/390.  Can this be committed?

> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
>       * gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90: Reduce accuracy for S/390.

> >From 70a35dd6f6bf906d8e5907667ad0f04f981a61ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] S/390: Reduce accuracy of bessel_6.f90.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> index e0220f7..da917ff 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
>  implicit none
>  real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9, 
> 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78] 
>  real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) &
> -                  * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ]
> +                  * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 98, 15 ]
>  ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit
>  ! more tolerant
>  !                  * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ]
> -- 
> 2.3.0

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany

Reply via email to