On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bill Schmidt
<wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546 identifies a failure
> in gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c.  The test case hasn't
> kept up with changes in the vectorizer, so it's looking for the wrong
> error message.  Also, the error message should be conditioned by a check
> for support of unaligned memory accesses.  This patch corrects these
> problems.
>
> For 4.9 and 5, the error message needs to be similarly changed.
> However, for these earlier releases, the check for misalignment support
> doesn't apply.
>
> Verified on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu for both -mcpu=power7 and
> -mcpu=power8, which differ in their support for misalignment.  Is this
> ok for trunk?  Provided verification succeeds on 4.9 and 5, is the
> revised test ok for those releases?
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
>
>
> 2016-01-28  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>         PR target/65546
>         * gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Correct
>         condition being checked, and disable it when the target supports
>         misaligned loads and stores.

Okay.

Thanks, David

Reply via email to