Hi, On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > which would be exactly the way no distribution would use it. So please > > just don't bundle ISL with CLoog. > > Well, I would simply have linked the bundled ISL statically into > libcloog. Which would still require not exporting the (bundled) libisl symbols from libcloog. Looking at the cloog git repo it doesn't seem that it knows anything about symbol versions (and it wouldn't help static libs anyway). No, the only even barely sane way is for the cloog version GCC should use to not include a builtin copy of some stale version of isl at all. Ciao, Michael.
