Dear Dominique, dear all, Many thanks for picking up the regression, which turned out to have a trivial cause. I have taken the liberty of assuming that this is tantamount to approval and have committed the patch as revision 233589. Any style or other wrinkles can be corrected later.
The reason that I took this liberty is that I must get past the deferred character length business as rapidly as possible. I will prepare a composite patch for 5-branch, with a view to committing it in a weeks time, so that both branches have the same capability. I have several other patches that should be backported to 5-branch, which will take most of the time that I can devote to gfortran tomorrow. More importantly, now that it has happened in the field, I must fix the collisions in SELECT TYPE. The only way that I know to do this reliably is to drop the use of a has and to use the extended type names directly. This will take a bit of work! Cheers Paul On 20 February 2016 at 13:11, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote: > >> Le 20 févr. 2016 à 10:58, Paul Richard Thomas >> <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Dear Dominique, >> >> Thanks for giving it a try. Although I cannot reproduce the problem, I >> am pretty sure that it is due to the omission of a couple of >> gfc_start_blocks. In the circumstances, it is a bit odd that the ICE >> does not show up on my system! >> >> Please give the attached a whirl. > > It fixes the PR without regression. > > Thanks, > > Dominique > > -- The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits. Albert Einstein