On 2016.02.25 at 11:07 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2016.02.25 at 11:01 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 02/17/2016 04:01 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > > On 02/17/2016 03:23 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >> "has been" looks weird. I'd say that the C++ compiler is now more > > >> aggressive... > > >> > > I've been thinking if the suggested patch makes sense any longer after > > the following patch was applied: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01651.html ? > > It still makes sense, just replace -fno-lifetime-dse with > -fno-lifetime-dse=1.
Err, I mean -flifetime-dse=1 of course. -- Markus