On 03/01/2016 01:15 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 02/29/2016 02:36 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Didn't I approve this a while ago? Not sure it's appropriate for stage4
though; is this series fixing an important regression?
Yes you did. I didn't commit it until the rest of the patch series was ready to
commit. The patch
series fixes a fundamental problem in the backend. The first iteration was
posted before stage 4 but
it took me a few iterations to get it right.
I've committed the patch now after retesting.
This looks like it has caused failures in the following tests on an
x86_64-none-linux-gnu build.
My inclination would be not to change this code in stage4, it looks too
fragile.
Bernd
