On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:36:23AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > Another patch reducing the accuracy required in the bessel_6 test.
>
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >
> > * gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90: Reduce accuracy for S/390.
Ok, thanks.
>
> > >From 70a35dd6f6bf906d8e5907667ad0f04f981a61ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:36:38 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] S/390: Reduce accuracy of bessel_6.f90.
> >
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90 | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> > index e0220f7..da917ff 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
> > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
> > implicit none
> > real,parameter :: values(*) = [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.9,
> > 1.8,2.0,3.0,4.0,4.25,8.0,34.53, 475.78]
> > real,parameter :: myeps(size(values)) = epsilon(0.0) &
> > - * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 92, 15 ]
> > + * [2, 7, 5, 6, 9, 12, 12, 7, 7, 8, 98, 15 ]
> > ! The following is sufficient for me - the values above are a bit
> > ! more tolerant
> > ! * [0, 5, 3, 4, 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 6, 66, 4 ]
> > --
> > 2.3.0
> >
Jakub
