On 03/17/2016 06:23 AM, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 3/14/2016 8:28 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
The example is not good, as discussed previously, and IMO the best
option is to remove it. Otherwise I have no objections to the latest
variant.
Despite the problems I have with the existing sample, adding the
information/warnings is more important to me, and more valuable to
users. Perhaps we can revisit the sample when pr24414 gets addressed.
My thought was to remove the example altogether, which we might want to
do later on. But for now I've committed your change since it can be seen
as an improvement in itself.
Bernd
