On 03/24/2016 03:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/24/2016 09:20 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Like this? No one has yet approved any better wording for the message,
so given that you said "it's not a regression" I've left it, but I would
now prefer "linemarker ignored due to incorrect nesting".
Bernd
cpp-leave.diff
PR lto/69650
* directives.c (do_linemarker): Test for file left but not entered
here.
* line-map.c (linemap_add): Not here.
PR lto/69650
* gcc.dg/pr69650.c: New test.
OK.
Also OK if you want to fixup the message.
And I just realized Bernd is out due to the holidays, so I went ahead
and committed this for him.
jeff
