+ /* Avoid folding references to struct members at offset
0 to
+ prevent tests like '&ptr->firstmember == 0' from getting
+ eliminated. When ptr is null, although the -> expression
+ is strictly speaking invalid, GCC retains it as a matter
+ of QoI. See PR c/44555. */
+ && (TREE_CODE (op0) != ADDR_EXPR
+ || TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0)) != COMPONENT_REF
+ || compare_tree_int (DECL_FIELD_OFFSET ((TREE_OPERAND
+ (TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0), 1))), 0))
Can we look at offset/bitpos here rather than examine the tree structure
of op0? get_inner_reference already examined it for us.
Good suggestion, thanks!
But you're still examining the tree structure:
+ && (TREE_CODE (op0) != ADDR_EXPR
+ || TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (op0, 0)) != COMPONENT_REF
+ || bitpos0 != 0)
Here instead of looking at op0 we can check (offset0 == NULL_TREE &&
bitpos0 != 0), which indicates a constant non-zero offset.
+ && TREE_CODE (arg1) == INTEGER_CST
+ && integer_zerop (arg1))
And here you don't need the check for INTEGER_CST.
I've updated the patch to simplify the tests.
I have to confess I don't yet find it straightforward to tell
exactly which tests are essential to avoid an ICE and which
ones can safely be simplified.
Martin
PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end
of array fails inside constant expression
PR c++/70170 - [6 regression] bogus not a constant expression error comparing
pointer to array to null
PR c++/70172 - incorrect reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer error
on invalid constexpr initialization
PR c++/70228 - insufficient detail in diagnostics for a constexpr out of bounds
array subscript
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-03-31 Martin Sebor <mse...@redhat.com>
PR c++/67376
PR c++/70170
PR c++/70172
PR c++/70228
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr10.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr9.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array5.C: Adjust text of expected diagnostic.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-string.C: Same.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-wstring2.C: Same.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C: Same.
* g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla1.C: Same.
* g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla2.C: Same.
* g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla3.C: Same.
* g++.dg/ubsan/pr63956.C: Same.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2016-03-31 Martin Sebor <mse...@redhat.com>
PR c++/67376
PR c++/70170
PR c++/70172
PR c++/70228
* constexpr.c (diag_array_subscript): New function.
(cxx_eval_array_reference): Detect out of bounds array indices.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-03-31 Martin Sebor <mse...@redhat.com>
PR c++/67376
* fold-const.c (maybe_nonzero_address): New function.
(fold_comparison): Call it. Fold equality and relational
expressions involving null pointers.
(tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p): Call maybe_nonzero_address.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index 8ea7111..5d1b8b3 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -1837,6 +1837,30 @@ find_array_ctor_elt (tree ary, tree dindex, bool insert = false)
return -1;
}
+/* Under the control of CTX, issue a detailed diagnostic for
+ an out-of-bounds subscript INDEX into the expression ARRAY. */
+
+static void
+diag_array_subscript (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree array, tree index)
+{
+ if (!ctx->quiet)
+ {
+ tree arraytype = TREE_TYPE (array);
+
+ /* Convert the unsigned array subscript to a signed integer to avoid
+ printing huge numbers for small negative values. */
+ tree sidx = fold_convert (ssizetype, index);
+ if (DECL_P (array))
+ {
+ error ("array subscript value %qE is outside the bounds "
+ "of array %qD of type %qT", sidx, array, arraytype);
+ inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (array), "declared here");
+ }
+ else
+ error ("array subscript value %qE is outside the bounds "
+ "of array type %qT", sidx, arraytype);
+ }
+}
/* Subroutine of cxx_eval_constant_expression.
Attempt to reduce a reference to an array slot. */
@@ -1885,8 +1909,7 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
if (!tree_fits_shwi_p (index)
|| (i = tree_to_shwi (index)) < 0)
{
- if (!ctx->quiet)
- error ("negative array subscript");
+ diag_array_subscript (ctx, ary, index);
*non_constant_p = true;
return t;
}
@@ -1898,8 +1921,7 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
VERIFY_CONSTANT (nelts);
if (!tree_int_cst_lt (index, nelts))
{
- if (!ctx->quiet)
- error ("array subscript out of bound");
+ diag_array_subscript (ctx, ary, index);
*non_constant_p = true;
return t;
}
diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.c b/gcc/fold-const.c
index 44fe2a2..eb66143 100644
--- a/gcc/fold-const.c
+++ b/gcc/fold-const.c
@@ -8336,6 +8336,20 @@ pointer_may_wrap_p (tree base, tree offset, HOST_WIDE_INT bitpos)
return total.to_uhwi () > (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) size;
}
+/* Return a positive integer when the symbol DECL is known to have
+ a nonzero address, zero when it's known not to (e.g., it's a weak
+ symbol), and a negative integer when the symbol is not yet in the
+ symbol table and so whether or not its address is zero is unknown. */
+static int
+maybe_nonzero_address (tree decl)
+{
+ if (DECL_P (decl) && decl_in_symtab_p (decl))
+ if (struct symtab_node *symbol = symtab_node::get_create (decl))
+ return symbol->nonzero_address ();
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
/* Subroutine of fold_binary. This routine performs all of the
transformations that are common to the equality/inequality
operators (EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR) and the ordering operators
@@ -8636,6 +8650,39 @@ fold_comparison (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type,
base1 = build_fold_addr_expr_loc (loc, base1);
return fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, base0, base1);
}
+ /* Comparison between an ordinary (non-weak) symbol and a null
+ pointer can be eliminated since such symbols must have a non
+ null address. In C, relational expressions between pointers
+ to objects and null pointers are undefined. The results
+ below follow the C++ rules with the additional property that
+ every object pointer compares greater than a null pointer.
+ */
+ else if (DECL_P (base0)
+ && maybe_nonzero_address (base0) > 0
+ /* Avoid folding references to struct members at offset 0 to
+ prevent tests like '&ptr->firstmember == 0' from getting
+ eliminated. When ptr is null, although the -> expression
+ is strictly speaking invalid, GCC retains it as a matter
+ of QoI. See PR c/44555. */
+ && (offset0 == NULL_TREE && bitpos0 != 0)
+ /* The caller guarantees that when one of the arguments is
+ constant (i.e., null in this case) it is second. */
+ && integer_zerop (arg1))
+ {
+ switch (code)
+ {
+ case EQ_EXPR:
+ case LE_EXPR:
+ case LT_EXPR:
+ return boolean_false_node;
+ case GE_EXPR:
+ case GT_EXPR:
+ case NE_EXPR:
+ return boolean_true_node;
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
+ }
}
/* Transform comparisons of the form X +- C1 CMP Y +- C2 to
@@ -13506,16 +13553,9 @@ tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p (tree t, bool *strict_overflow_p)
/* For objects in symbol table check if we know they are non-zero.
Don't do anything for variables and functions before symtab is built;
it is quite possible that they will be declared weak later. */
- if (DECL_P (base) && decl_in_symtab_p (base))
- {
- struct symtab_node *symbol;
-
- symbol = symtab_node::get_create (base);
- if (symbol)
- return symbol->nonzero_address ();
- else
- return false;
- }
+ int nonzero_addr = maybe_nonzero_address (base);
+ if (nonzero_addr >= 0)
+ return nonzero_addr;
/* Function local objects are never NULL. */
if (DECL_P (base)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr10.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f75b3c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+// PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end
+// of array fails inside constant expression
+// This test verifies the aspect of the bug raised in comment #10,
+// specifically comparing pointers to null. The basic regression test
+// is in g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-67376.C.
+// Note also that while the description of the bug talks about pointers
+// pointing past the end of arrays but the prolem is more general than
+// that and involves all constexpr object pointers.
+
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wall -Wextra" }
+
+namespace A {
+
+extern int i;
+
+constexpr int *p0 = &i;
+
+constexpr bool b0 = p0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b1 = p0 == 0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b2 = p0 != 0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b3 = p0 < 0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b4 = p0 <= 0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b5 = p0 > 0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b6 = p0 >= 0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+
+constexpr bool b7 = !p0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b8 = 0 == p0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b9 = 0 != p0; // { dg-warning "address of .A::i." }
+constexpr bool b10 = 0 < p0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b11 = 0 <= p0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b12 = 0 > p0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+constexpr bool b13 = 0 >= p0; // { dg-warning "ordered comparison" }
+
+}
+
+namespace B {
+
+// PR c++/70172 - incorrect reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer
+// error on invalid constexpr initialization
+
+struct S { int a, b[1]; } s;
+
+constexpr S *p0 = &s;
+
+constexpr int *q0 = p0->b; // { dg-bogus "reinterpret_cast from integer to pointer" }
+
+}
+
+namespace WeakRefTest1 {
+
+extern __attribute__ ((weak)) int i;
+
+constexpr int *p0 = &i;
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wextra"
+// Suppress warning: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero
+
+constexpr bool b0 = p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b1 = p0 == 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b2 = p0 != 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b4 = p0 <= 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b5 = p0 > 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+
+constexpr bool b7 = !p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b8 = 0 == p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b9 = 0 != p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b10 = 0 < p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b13 = 0 >= p0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+
+// The following are accepted as constant expressions due to bug c++/70196.
+constexpr bool b3 = p0 < 0;
+constexpr bool b6 = p0 >= 0;
+constexpr bool b11 = 0 <= p0;
+constexpr bool b12 = 0 > p0;
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
+
+}
+
+namespace WeakRefTest2 {
+
+extern __attribute__ ((weak)) int i;
+
+constexpr int *p1 = &i + 1;
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wextra"
+// Suppress warning: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero
+
+constexpr bool b0 = p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b1 = p1 == 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b2 = p1 != 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b4 = p1 <= 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b5 = p1 > 0; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+
+constexpr bool b7 = !p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b8 = 0 == p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b9 = 0 != p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b10 = 0 < p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+constexpr bool b13 = 0 >= p1; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+
+// The following are accepted as constant expressions due to bug c++/70196.
+// constexpr bool b3 = p1 < 0;
+// constexpr bool b6 = p1 >= 0;
+// constexpr bool b11 = 0 <= p1;
+// constexpr bool b12 = 0 > p1;
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
+
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr9.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0250cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array-ptr9.C
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+// PR c++/67376 - [5/6 regression] Comparison with pointer to past-the-end
+// of array fails inside constant expression
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+int a [2];
+
+constexpr const int* pa[] = {
+ a,
+ a + 0,
+ a + 1,
+ a + 2,
+ &a [0],
+ &a [0] + 0,
+ &a [0] + 1,
+ &a [0] + 2,
+ &a [1],
+ &a [1] - 1,
+ &a [1] + 0,
+ &a [1] + 1,
+ &a [2] - 2,
+ &a [2] - 1,
+ &a [2] + 0
+};
+
+#define Assert(e) static_assert ((e), #e)
+
+Assert (!(a == 0));
+Assert (!(a == (int*)0));
+Assert (!(a == nullptr));
+
+Assert (a != 0);
+Assert (a != (int*)0);
+Assert (a != nullptr);
+
+Assert (!(0 == a));
+Assert (!((int*)0 == a));
+Assert (!(nullptr == a));
+
+Assert (0 != a);
+Assert ((int*)0 != a);
+Assert (nullptr != a);
+
+bool constexpr test_eq (unsigned inx)
+{
+ return inx ? pa [inx - 1] == 0 && 0 == pa [inx - 1]
+ && test_eq (inx - 1) : pa [inx] == 0 && 0 == pa [inx];
+}
+
+Assert (!test_eq (sizeof pa / sizeof *pa));
+
+bool constexpr test_ne (unsigned inx)
+{
+ return inx ? pa [inx - 1] != 0 && 0 != pa [inx - 1]
+ && test_ne (inx - 1) : pa [inx] != 0 && 0 != pa [inx];
+}
+
+Assert (test_ne (sizeof pa / sizeof *pa));
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array5.C
index 4605b4b..00dfd6d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array5.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array5.C
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
// Reliable ICE
constexpr int n[3] = {};
-constexpr int k = n[-1]; // { dg-error "negative" }
+constexpr int k = n[-1]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
// Some random byte
-constexpr char c = "foo"[-1000]; // { dg-error "negative" }
+constexpr char c = "foo"[-1000]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..420a04b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+// Verify the correctness of folding relational expressions involving
+// pointers to array elements and struct data members and null pointers.
+// Although the C semantics of relational expressions are only defined
+// for pointers to objects, C++ makes them well-defined when
+// (nullptr < p) yields true. See the discussion of the patch for
+// c++/67376 on gcc-patches for additional background.
+
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-fdump-tree-optimized" }
+
+// Runtime assert. Used for potentially invalid expressions.
+#define RA(e) ((e) ? (void)0 : __builtin_abort ())
+
+// Static assert. Used for valid core constant expressions.
+#define SA(e) static_assert ((e), #e)
+
+void test_first_array_element ()
+{
+ static constexpr int a[] = { 0 };
+ constexpr const int *null = 0;
+ constexpr const int *pi = a;
+
+ // The following are valid constant expressions since in &*pi
+ // the '&*' "cancel each other out."
+ SA (!(null == &*pi));
+ SA ( (null != &*pi));
+
+ // The validity of the relational expressions involving null
+ // pointers in a constexpr context is questionable. Use a run
+ // time assertion to verify these.
+ RA ( (null < &*pi));
+ RA ( (null <= &*pi));
+ RA (!(null > &*pi));
+ RA (!(null >= &*pi));
+
+ SA (!(&*pi == null));
+ SA ( (&*pi != null));
+ RA (!(&*pi < null));
+ RA (!(&*pi <= null));
+ RA ( (&*pi > null));
+ RA ( (&*pi >= null));
+
+ // The following are valid constant expressions since &pi [0] is
+ // equivalent to &*pi.
+ SA (!(null == &pi [0]));
+ SA ( (null != &pi [0]));
+ RA ( (null < &pi [0]));
+ RA ( (null <= &pi [0]));
+ RA (!(null > &pi [0]));
+ RA (!(null >= &pi [0]));
+
+ SA (!(&pi [0] == null));
+ SA ( (&pi [0] != null));
+ RA (!(&pi [0] < null));
+ RA (!(&pi [0] <= null));
+ RA ( (&pi [0] > null));
+ RA ( (&pi [0] >= null));
+}
+
+void test_first_null_array_element ()
+{
+ constexpr const int *pi = 0;
+ constexpr const int *qi = 0;
+
+ // The following are valid constant expressions since in &*qi
+ // the '&*' "cancel each other out."
+ SA ( (pi == &*qi));
+ SA (!(pi != &*qi));
+
+ // The validity of the relational expressions involving null
+ // pointers in a constexpr context is questionable.
+ RA (!(pi < &*qi));
+ RA ( (pi <= &*qi));
+ RA (!(pi > &*qi));
+ RA ( (pi >= &*qi));
+
+ SA ( (&*qi == pi));
+ SA (!(&*qi != pi));
+ RA (!(&*qi < pi));
+ RA ( (&*qi <= pi));
+ RA (!(&*qi > pi));
+ RA ( (&*qi >= pi));
+
+ // The following are valid constant expressions since &qi [0] is
+ // equivalent to &*qi.
+ SA ( (pi == &qi [0]));
+ SA (!(pi != &qi [0]));
+ RA (!(pi < &qi [0]));
+ RA ( (pi <= &qi [0]));
+ RA (!(pi > &qi [0]));
+ RA ( (pi >= &qi [0]));
+
+ SA ( (&qi [0] == pi));
+ SA (!(&qi [0] != pi));
+ RA (!(&qi [0] < pi));
+ RA ( (&qi [0] <= pi));
+ RA (!(&qi [0] > pi));
+ RA ( (&qi [0] >= pi));
+}
+
+void test_first_struct_member ()
+{
+ static struct S { int a, b; } s = { 0, 0 };
+
+ constexpr const int *p = 0;
+ constexpr const S *q = &s;
+
+ SA (!(p == &q->b));
+ SA ( (p != &q->b));
+ RA ( (p < &q->b));
+ RA ( (p <= &q->b));
+ RA (!(p > &q->b));
+ RA (!(p >= &q->b));
+
+ SA (!(&q->b == p));
+ SA ( (&q->b != p));
+ RA (!(&q->b < p));
+ RA (!(&q->b <= p));
+ RA ( (&q->b > p));
+ RA ( (&q->b >= p));
+}
+
+// Expect all runtime asserts to have been eliminated as a result
+// of the tested expressions constant folded into true.
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "abort" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-string.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-string.C
index 0f561a4..41fa466 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-string.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-string.C
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
constexpr char c1 = "hi"[1];
constexpr char c2 = "hi"[2];
-constexpr char c3 = "hi"[3]; // { dg-error "out of bound" }
+constexpr char c3 = "hi"[3]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-wstring2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-wstring2.C
index db79a9c..4055e0e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-wstring2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-wstring2.C
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
// PR c++/48570
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
-constexpr wchar_t c1 = L"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "out of bound" }
-constexpr char16_t c2 = u"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "out of bound" }
-constexpr char32_t c3 = U"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "out of bound" }
+constexpr wchar_t c1 = L"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
+constexpr char16_t c2 = u"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
+constexpr char32_t c3 = U"hi"[3]; // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C
index a4aeba5..6bd34a4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65398.C
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ constexpr char c5 = *(&s[2] + 0);
constexpr char c6 = *(&s[0] + 2);
constexpr char c7 = *(&s[2] + 1);
-constexpr char d1 = *(&s[4] - 0); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr char d1 = *(&s[4] - 0); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
constexpr char d2 = *(&s[4] - 1);
constexpr char d3 = *(&s[4] - 2);
constexpr char d4 = *(&s[4] - 3);
constexpr char d5 = *(&s[4] - 4);
-constexpr char d6 = *(&s[4] - 5); // { dg-error "negative array subscript" }
+constexpr char d6 = *(&s[4] - 5); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
/* Don't accept invalid stuff. */
constexpr char e1 = *(&s[5] - 1); // { dg-error "is not a constant expression" }
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ constexpr int i5 = *(&l[2] + 0);
constexpr int i6 = *(&l[0] + 2);
constexpr int i7 = *(&l[2] + 1);
-constexpr char j1 = *(&l[4] - 0); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr char j1 = *(&l[4] - 0); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
constexpr char j2 = *(&l[4] - 1);
constexpr char j3 = *(&l[4] - 2);
constexpr char j4 = *(&l[4] - 3);
constexpr char j5 = *(&l[4] - 4);
-constexpr char j6 = *(&l[4] - 5); // { dg-error "negative array subscript" }
+constexpr char j6 = *(&l[4] - 5); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
/* Don't accept invalid stuff. */
constexpr char k1 = *(&l[5] - 1); // { dg-error "is not a constant expression" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla1.C
index a5615bb..21eb93d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla1.C
@@ -27,4 +27,4 @@ fn_not_ok (int n)
}
constexpr int n1 = fn_ok (3);
-constexpr int n2 = fn_not_ok (3); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr int n2 = fn_not_ok (3); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla2.C
index 6cb1f70..6aab184 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla2.C
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ fn_ok (int n)
}
constexpr int i1 = fn_ok (3);
-constexpr int i2 = fn_bad (3); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr int i2 = fn_bad (3); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla3.C
index ba4eb50..33fc968 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/constexpr-vla3.C
@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ foo (int n)
return z;
}
-constexpr int n = foo (3); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr int n = foo (3); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr63956.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr63956.C
index b265631..90360be 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr63956.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr63956.C
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ fn5 (const int *a, int b)
constexpr int m1[4] = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
constexpr int m2 = fn5 (m1, 3);
-constexpr int m3 = fn5 (m1, 4); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr int m3 = fn5 (m1, 4); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
constexpr int
fn6 (const int &a, int b)
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ fn8 (int i)
}
constexpr int o1 = fn8 (9);
-constexpr int o2 = fn8 (10); // { dg-error "array subscript out of bound" }
+constexpr int o2 = fn8 (10); // { dg-error "array subscript" }
constexpr int
fn9 (int a, int b)
