> On Apr 15, 2016, at 00:42 , Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> > wrote: > >> >> Something like the attached patch, at least for next stage1 until the >> more general issue is sorted out ? > > It's a bit heavy; as a workaround, we may want this clobber in the stack > deallocation in the epilogue, but not in all other places stack_tie is > used.
OK, I can add an epilogue_p argument or something like that. > And for stage 1 we do not really want a workaround, we want to fix the > actual problem ;-) Sure. It might take some time though, and we might want a workaround in the interim. Maintainers' call I suppose :)
