On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:57:30AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 07:35 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >+          permerror (type_start_token->location,
> >+                     "extra qualification not allowed");
> >+          type = error_mark_node;
> 
> If we're using permerror, we shouldn't set type to error_mark_node; if we do
> that, -fpermissive won't make it work.

Yikes, that makes sense.  I removed the assignment.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-04-21  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/70513
        * parser.c (cp_parser_enum_specifier): Check and possibly error for
        extra qualification.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum12.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum13.C: New test.

diff --git gcc/cp/parser.c gcc/cp/parser.c
index 0a1ed1a..feb8de7 100644
--- gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -17233,6 +17233,16 @@ cp_parser_enum_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
                          type, prev_scope, nested_name_specifier);
              type = error_mark_node;
            }
+         /* If that scope is the scope where the declaration is being placed
+            the program is invalid.  */
+         else if (CLASS_TYPE_P (nested_name_specifier)
+                  && CLASS_TYPE_P (prev_scope)
+                  && same_type_p (nested_name_specifier, prev_scope))
+           {
+             permerror (type_start_token->location,
+                        "extra qualification not allowed");
+             nested_name_specifier = NULL_TREE;
+           }
        }
 
       if (scoped_enum_p)
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum12.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum12.C
index e69de29..906ba68 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum12.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// PR c++/70513
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct S1
+{
+  enum E : int;
+  enum S1::E : int { X } e; // { dg-error "extra qualification not allowed" }
+};
+
+struct S2
+{
+  enum class E : int;
+  enum class S2::E : int { X } e; // { dg-error "extra qualification not 
allowed" }
+};
+
+struct S3
+{
+  enum struct E : int;
+  enum struct S3::E : int { X } e; // { dg-error "extra qualification not 
allowed" }
+};
+
+struct S4
+{
+  struct S5
+  {
+    enum E : char;
+    enum S4::S5::E : char { X } e; // { dg-error "extra qualification not 
allowed" }
+  };
+};
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum13.C 
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum13.C
index e69de29..b8027f0 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum13.C
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/forw_enum13.C
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// PR c++/70513
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename T>
+class D1
+{
+  enum A : int;
+  enum D1::A : int { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not allowed" }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class D2
+{
+  enum A : int;
+  enum D2<T>::A : int { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not 
allowed" }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class D3
+{
+  enum D3::A { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not allowed" }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class D4
+{
+  enum D4<T>::A { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not allowed" }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class D5
+{
+  class D6
+  {
+    enum D6::A { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not allowed" }
+  };
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+class D7
+{
+  class D8
+  {
+    enum A : int;
+    enum D8::A : int { foo } c; // { dg-error "extra qualification not 
allowed" }
+  };
+};

        Marek

Reply via email to