On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
>>> <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>> > Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
>>> > make_epilogue_seq.
>>> >
>>> > Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Segher
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> >
>>> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
>>> > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from...
>>> > (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here.
>>> >
>>>
>>> It breaks x86:
>>
>> Are you sure it is this patch causing it? As noted, it was tested on x86.
>>
>
> I am pretty sure. How did you test it on x86? What do you get with
>
> # make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=ctor*.C --target_board='unix{-m32,}'"
>
I opened:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71180
--
H.J.
