On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:21:37PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > --- gcc/tree-vect-slp.c.jj      2016-01-08 21:45:57.000000000 +0100
> > +++ gcc/tree-vect-slp.c 2016-01-11 12:07:19.633366712 +0100
> > @@ -2999,12 +2999,9 @@ vect_get_constant_vectors (tree op, slp_
> >                   gimple *init_stmt;
> >                   if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (vector_type))
> >                     {
> > -                     gcc_assert (fold_convertible_p (TREE_TYPE 
> > (vector_type),
> > -                                                     op));
> > +                     gcc_assert (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)));
> >                       init_stmt = gimple_build_assign (new_temp, NOP_EXPR, 
> > op);
> 
> In vect_init_vector we had to introduce COND_EXPR to choose between 0 and -1 
> for
> boolean vectors.  Shouldn't we do similar in SLP?

Apparently the answer to this is YES.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/6.2?

2016-06-03  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/71259
        * tree-vect-slp.c (vect_get_constant_vectors): For
        VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P, return all ones constant instead of
        one for constant op, and use COND_EXPR for non-constant.

        * gcc.dg/vect/pr71259.c: New test.

--- gcc/tree-vect-slp.c.jj      2016-05-24 10:56:02.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-vect-slp.c 2016-06-03 17:01:12.740955935 +0200
@@ -3056,7 +3056,7 @@ vect_get_constant_vectors (tree op, slp_
                      if (integer_zerop (op))
                        op = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (vector_type), 0);
                      else if (integer_onep (op))
-                       op = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (vector_type), 1);
+                       op = build_all_ones_cst (TREE_TYPE (vector_type));
                      else
                        gcc_unreachable ();
                    }
@@ -3071,8 +3071,14 @@ vect_get_constant_vectors (tree op, slp_
                  gimple *init_stmt;
                  if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (vector_type))
                    {
+                     tree true_val
+                       = build_all_ones_cst (TREE_TYPE (vector_type));
+                     tree false_val
+                       = build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (vector_type));
                      gcc_assert (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op)));
-                     init_stmt = gimple_build_assign (new_temp, NOP_EXPR, op);
+                     init_stmt = gimple_build_assign (new_temp, COND_EXPR,
+                                                      op, true_val,
+                                                      false_val);
                    }
                  else
                    {
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71259.c.jj      2016-06-03 17:05:37.693475438 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr71259.c 2016-06-03 17:05:32.418544731 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/71259 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-mavx" { target avx_runtime } } */
+
+#include "tree-vect.h"
+
+long a, b[1][44][2];
+long long c[44][17][2];
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int i, j, k;
+  check_vect ();
+  asm volatile ("" : : : "memory");
+  for (i = 0; i < 44; i++)
+    for (j = 0; j < 17; j++)
+      for (k = 0; k < 2; k++)
+       c[i][j][k] = (30995740 >= *(k + *(j + *b)) != (a != 8)) - 
5105075050047261684;
+  asm volatile ("" : : : "memory");
+  for (i = 0; i < 44; i++) 
+    for (j = 0; j < 17; j++)
+      for (k = 0; k < 2; k++)
+       if (c[i][j][k] != -5105075050047261684)
+         __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to