On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote: > On 03/06/16 21:32, Evandro Menezes wrote: >> Shouldn't this read "The Qualcomm QDF24xx processors are now supported via >> the"? >> > I used Jim's suggestion at > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01423.html. > I don't have a strong opinion on it either. > If Jim objects to the wording I'm happy to change it.
I don't have a strong opinion either. The option was named qdf24xx in anticipation that there might be more than one closely related part, but currently there are zero of them, as nothing has been released yet. Jim
