Hi! On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:31:48 +0200, I wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:07:17 +0200, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:28:57PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > + /* The OpenACC cache directive explicitly only allows > > > > "array > > > > + elements or subarrays". Would it make sense to allow > > > > complete > > > > + arrays as a GNU extension? */ > > > > Please try to not add GNU extensions on top of OpenACC, unless strictly > > necessary. > > It is better if the compiler is strict and there is interoperability. > > If you think it should accept something that it doesn't, talk to the OpenACC > > committee. > > Thanks, that makes sense.
I filed <https://github.com/OpenACC/openacc-spec/issues/55> "Make OpenACC cache directive less restrictive". Grüße Thomas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
