On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I know a short version of this was applied, but am wondering > whether to retain the example (and a note on -flifetime-dse=1), > both per the discussion in February? > > Want to make those enhancements?
And here is one small change I just applied... Gerald Index: changes.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v retrieving revision 1.85 diff -u -r1.85 changes.html --- changes.html 8 Jun 2016 15:00:53 -0000 1.85 +++ changes.html 20 Jun 2016 10:33:35 -0000 @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ <code>-fconcepts</code>.</li> <li><code>-flifetime-dse</code> is more aggressive in dead-store elimination in situations where - a memory store to a location precedes a constructor to the + a memory store to a location precedes a constructor to that memory location.</li> <li>G++ now supports <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z.html">C++17</a>