On 06/18/2016 01:31 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers
inappropriate FAIL.
E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and
- gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test")
- gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp" 2)
etc.
This is a recurring problem as can be seen by some -fno-ident additions
by commits from e.g. Michael Meissner over the years: builtins-58.c,
powerpc/pr46728-?.c
The patch below adds -fno-ident if a testcase contains one of
scan-assembler, scan-assembler-not or scan-assembler-times.
Regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux on a fixups-testsuite branch
where it fixes several false FAILs without regressions.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-06-18 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR testsuite/52665
* lib/gcc-dg.exp (gcc-dg-test-1): Iterate over _required_options.
* lib/target-supports.exp (scan-assembler_required_options,
scan-assembler-not_required_options,
scan-assembler-times_required_options): Add -fno-ident.
* lib/scanasm.exp (scan-assembler-times): Fix error message.
* c-c++-common/ident-0a.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ident-0b.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ident-1a.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ident-1b.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ident-2a.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ident-2b.c: New test.
Ok for trunk?
PS: proc force_conventional_output_for would be a bit misnomed by this,
not sure if it should be renamed to maybe set_required_options_for or
the like?
OK.
Changing force_conventional_output to set_required_options_for is
pre-approved as well.
jeff
