On 06/28/2016 03:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > I wonder about the inliner change. If one marks a single function > with -fstack-protector > that implicitely marks callers with -fno-stack-protector. So I'd > rather disable inlining > between different settings here?
It works in the opposite way, if a caller has the flag disabled and a callee has, than the flag is also set to the caller. Honza asked me to propagate the flag in such manner. If you prefer to not to inline, I can prepare a patch? Martin
