On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I've run into some trouble building cmcstl2: declarator requirements >> > on a function can lead to constraints that tsubst_constraint doesn't >> > handle. What was your theory of only handling a few _CONSTR codes >> > there? This is blocking me from checking in the patch. > > I wonder if those were the problems that I was running into, but hadn't > diagnosed. I had thought it shouldn't be possible to get the full set of > constraints in tsubst_constraint. I may have mis-analyzed the problem for > function constraints.
Any further thoughts? Jason
