On 28 July 2016 at 19:18, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 28 July 2016 at 15:58, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> wrote:
>> > On Mo, Jul 25 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org> 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c 
>> >> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..dedb895
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> >> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> >> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ccp-details -Wno-int-to-pointer-cast" } 
>> >> */
>> >> +
>> >> +#include <stdint.h>
>> >> +
>> >> +void f1();
>> >> +void f2();
>> >> +
>> >> +void
>> >> +foo (int a)
>> >> +{
>> >> +  void *cst = 0;
>> >> +  if ((int *) a == cst)
>> >> +    {
>> >> +      f1 ();
>> >> +      if (a)
>> >> +     f2 ();
>> >> +    }
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to if \\(_\[0-9\]* == 
>> >> 0\\)" "ccp1" } } */
>> >
>> > This fails on all ilp32 platforms.
>> Oops, sorry for the breakage.
>> With -m32, the pattern is applied during forwprop1 rather than ccp1.
>> I wonder though why ccp1 fails to fold the pattern with -m32 ?
>> Looking at the dumps:
>>
>> without -m32:
>> input to ccp1 pass:
>>   <bb 2>:
>>   cst_4 = 0B;
>>   _1 = (long int) a_5(D);
>>   _2 = (void *) _1;
>>   if (cst_4 == _2)
>>     goto <bb 3>;
>>   else
>>     goto <bb 5>;
>>
>> cc1 pass dump shows:
>> Substituting values and folding statements
>>
>> Folding statement: _1 = (long int) a_5(D);
>> Not folded
>> Folding statement: _2 = (void *) _1;
>> Not folded
>> Folding statement: if (cst_4 == _2)
>> which is likely CONSTANT
>> Applying pattern match.pd:2537, gimple-match.c:6530
>> gimple_simplified to if (_1 == 0)
>> Folded into: if (_1 == 0)
>>
>> with -m32:
>> input to ccp1 pass:
>>  <bb 2>:
>>   cst_3 = 0B;
>>   a.0_1 = (void *) a_4(D);
>>   if (cst_3 == a.0_1)
>>     goto <bb 3>;
>>   else
>>     goto <bb 5>;
>>
>> ccp1 pass dump shows:
>> Substituting values and folding statements
>>
>> Folding statement: a.0_1 = (void *) a_4(D);
>> Not folded
>> Folding statement: if (cst_3 == a.0_1)
>> which is likely CONSTANT
>> Folded into: if (a.0_1 == 0B)
>>
>> I am not able to understand why it doesn't fold it to
>> if (a_4(D) == 0) ?
>> forwprop1 folds a.0_1 == 0B to a_4(D) == 0.
>
> It's because CCP folds with follow-single-use edges but the
> match-and-simplify code uses a single callback to valueize and
> decide whether its valid to follow the SSA edge.  I did have some
> old patches trying to fix that but never followed up on those.
Thanks for the explanation.
>
>> I suppose the test-case would need to scan ccp1 for non-ilp targets
>> and forwprop1 for
>> ilp targets. How do update the test-case to reflect this ?
>
> It's simpler to verify that at some point (forwprop) we have the
> expected IL rather than testing for the match debug prints.
In forwprop dump,
For m32, we have if (a_4(D) == 0)
and without m32: if (_1 == 0)
So need to match either a default def or anonymous name
in the test-case, which I am having a bit of trouble writing regex for.
In the patch i simply chose to match "== 0\\)", not sure if that's a good idea.
Also how do I update the test-case so that it gets tested twice, once with -m32
and once without ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> Richard.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Prathamesh
>> >
>> > Andreas.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
>> > GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
>> > "And now for something completely different."
>>
>>
>
> --
> Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
> 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c
index dedb895..035c3cb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr70920-4.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ccp-details -Wno-int-to-pointer-cast" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop-details -Wno-int-to-pointer-cast" } 
*/
 
 #include <stdint.h>
 
@@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ foo (int a)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "gimple_simplified to if \\(_\[0-9\]* == 0\\)" 
"ccp1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "== 0\\)" "forwprop1" } } */

Reply via email to