On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 08/01/2016 01:58 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> After changing the expected number of loop iterations, IVOPTS decides to >>> pick up an another IV. >>> Bin agreed that the test-case still makes sense with changed expectation. >>> >>> Ready to be installed? >> >> Hmm, but do all targets replace the exit test? I think you want to >> allow either no "Replacing" >> or just "Replacing exit test" - not sure how to encode that in a regex. >> >> Richard. > > Well, the test-case is run just on { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64 > with -m64, thus I guess the exit condition should be always replaced.
Ah, ok then. Richard. > Martin > > >> >>> Martin >