Hi! The control structure is too hard to understand in certain cases for the uninit pass - the test for the last iteration compares against a specific value, while in the loop it tests for the particular assigned chunks.
So, this patch marks the private vars for lastprivate or for simd linear iterators as TREE_NO_WARNING. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk. 2016-08-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/72781 * omp-low.c (lower_lastprivate_clauses): Set TREE_NO_WARNING on the private vars for lastprivate and for linear iterator. * gcc.dg/gomp/pr72781.c: New test. --- gcc/omp-low.c.jj 2016-07-21 18:11:00.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/omp-low.c 2016-08-08 14:21:30.319798379 +0200 @@ -5455,7 +5455,15 @@ lower_lastprivate_clauses (tree clauses, new_var = lookup_decl (var, ctx->outer); } else - new_var = lookup_decl (var, ctx); + { + new_var = lookup_decl (var, ctx); + /* Avoid uninitialized warnings for lastprivate and + for linear iterators. */ + if (predicate + && (OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (c) == OMP_CLAUSE_LASTPRIVATE + || OMP_CLAUSE_LINEAR_NO_COPYIN (c))) + TREE_NO_WARNING (new_var) = 1; + } if (simduid && DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (new_var)) { --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr72781.c.jj 2016-08-08 14:27:09.481617344 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gomp/pr72781.c 2016-08-08 14:27:50.582110675 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* PR middle-end/72781 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -Wuninitialized" } */ + +int u; + +void +foo (int *p) +{ + int i; + #pragma omp for simd lastprivate(u) schedule (static, 32) /* { dg-bogus "may be used uninitialized in this function" } */ + for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) + u = p[i]; +} + +void +bar (int *p) +{ + int i; + #pragma omp taskloop simd lastprivate(u) /* { dg-bogus "may be used uninitialized in this function" } */ + for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) + u = p[i]; +} Jakub