On 08/09/2016 04:58 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01869.html
This seems to be dependent upon other patches, this is not OK until all
prereqs are resolved.
You're using SI/DI in the descriptions, but then using more traditional
C types like int, unsigned, long long in the actual test.
If you intent is really to nail down SI/DI mode testing, then the way to
go will be to define typedefs that correspond directly to SI and DI modes:
typedef unsigned int u32 __attribute__((mode(SI)));
typedef signed int s32 __attribute__((mode(SI)));
You can do something similar for DImode.
It may not matter because of your effective-target
{divmod,divmod_simode} selectors, but it still seems cleaner.
With that change, this is OK when its prereqs are resolved.
jeff