On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> I've noticed a couple of places that should be using
> gimple_call_noreturn_p but are using gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN
> instead.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Richard.

> 2016-08-17  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_call): Use gimple_call_noreturn_p
>       instead of testing ECF_NORETURN bit in gimple_call_flags.
>       * tree-cfg.c (make_edges_bb, execute_fixup_cfg): Likewise.
>       * predict.c (tree_bb_level_predictions): Likewise.
>       * gimple-low.c (gimple_stmt_may_fallthru): Likewise.
> 
> --- gcc/gimple-fold.c.jj      2016-07-19 19:29:05.250752770 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c 2016-08-17 13:34:21.209544835 +0200
> @@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ gimple_fold_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *
>                 /* If changing the call to __cxa_pure_virtual
>                    or similar noreturn function, adjust gimple_call_fntype
>                    too.  */
> -               if ((gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN)
> +               if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt)
>                     && VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
>                     && TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))
>                     && (TREE_VALUE (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
> --- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj 2016-08-16 18:50:14.918137409 +0200
> +++ gcc/tree-cfg.c    2016-08-17 13:35:49.059419876 +0200
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ make_edges_bb (basic_block bb, struct om
>       }
>        /* Some calls are known not to return.  */
>        else
> -     fallthru = !(gimple_call_flags (last) & ECF_NORETURN);
> +     fallthru = !gimple_call_noreturn_p (last);
>        break;
>  
>      case GIMPLE_ASSIGN:
> @@ -9083,7 +9083,7 @@ execute_fixup_cfg (void)
>         if (!stmt
>             || (!is_ctrl_stmt (stmt)
>                 && (!is_gimple_call (stmt)
> -                   || (gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN) == 0)))
> +                   || !gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt))))
>           {
>             if (stmt && is_gimple_call (stmt))
>               gimple_call_set_ctrl_altering (stmt, false);
> --- gcc/predict.c.jj  2016-08-06 12:11:52.254489381 +0200
> +++ gcc/predict.c     2016-08-17 13:35:12.365889754 +0200
> @@ -2639,8 +2639,7 @@ tree_bb_level_predictions (void)
>  
>         if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
>           {
> -           if ((gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN)
> -               && has_return_edges)
> +           if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt) && has_return_edges)
>               predict_paths_leading_to (bb, PRED_NORETURN,
>                                         NOT_TAKEN);
>             decl = gimple_call_fndecl (stmt);
> --- gcc/gimple-low.c.jj       2016-05-03 14:12:19.053019350 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimple-low.c  2016-08-17 13:34:54.813114525 +0200
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ gimple_stmt_may_fallthru (gimple *stmt)
>  
>      case GIMPLE_CALL:
>        /* Functions that do not return do not fall through.  */
> -      return (gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN) == 0;
> +      return !gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt);
>  
>      default:
>        return true;
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to