On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > >> Ok if libcpp maintainers do not object. > > I consider the libcpp changes something I can self-approve - but, any > comments?
No comments on that part. >> Can you quickly verify if LTO works with the new types? I don't see anything >> that would prevent it but having new global trees and backends initializing >> them >> might come up with surprises (see tree-streamer.c:preload_common_nodes) > > Well, the execution tests are in gcc.dg/torture, which is run with various > options including -flto (and I've checked the testsuite logs to confirm > these tests are indeed run with such options). Is there something else > you think should be tested? No, I think that's enough. Thanks, Richard. > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com