On 20/09/16 17:12, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 20/09/16 16:30, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/20/2016 05:18 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I assume HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM is never zero.
It could be zero. It's just a hard register number. No target has the
property that its hard frame pointer register is 0 though :-)
git blame to the rescue. The current state comes from one of tbsaunde's cleanup
patches:
> diff --git a/gcc/regrename.c b/gcc/regrename.c
index 174d3b5..e5248a5 100644
--- a/gcc/regrename.c
+++ b/gcc/regrename.c
@@ -442,12 +442,10 @@ rename_chains (void)
continue;
if (fixed_regs[reg] || global_regs[reg]
-#if !HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER
- || (frame_pointer_needed && reg == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
-#else
- || (frame_pointer_needed && reg == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
-#endif
- )
+ || (!HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER && frame_pointer_needed
+ && reg == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
+ || (HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM && frame_pointer_needed
+ && reg == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM))
continue;
COPY_HARD_REG_SET (this_unavailable, unavailable);
Looks like it never got reviewed and was committed as preapproved.
The #ifdef we had before looks odd too. Maybe this should just read
if (fixed_regs[reg] || global_regs[reg]
|| (frame_pointer_needed && reg == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM))
I'll try bootstrapping and testing this change on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
... and I'm hitting the same issue in sel-sched.c:
if (fixed_regs[regno]
|| global_regs[regno]
|| (!HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER && frame_pointer_needed
&& regno == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
|| (HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM && frame_pointer_needed
&& regno == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM)
I think the condition was copied from regrename.c (or the other way around),
so I'll fix it the same way.
Kyrill
Thanks,
Kyrill
Bernd