Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: >> But then the implementation would need relicensing as well, wouldn't >> it? > > Which implementation? of Ozkan's library?
libiberty's filename_cmp.c is GPL and implements two of the functions in filenames.h; if those are why he's using it, then it's still GPL unless filename_cmp.c is changed also. > Why would it need to > change? It's perfectly okay to link GPL code with LGPL code, we do > this all the time with libgcc, no? Or am I missing something? libgcc has an exception that covers most of those cases; be careful when comparing those to your (his) use case.
