On 09/28/2016 06:36 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
A "p" prefix for pseudos might still be a good idea, but there's still
the issue of a real "p0" register name causing confusion.
So how do you think we should deal with distinguishing between the
different registers that may appear in a dump file?
I think the main problem we were trying to solve is making sure we can
make future-proof dumps. So that would argue for allowing h0, v0, p0
syntax in the reader, but not printing them out that way by default.
Also, if we don't already, allow hard regs to be specified by name in
the reader, and maybe even require it for virtuals.
Bernd
