Hi Doug,
On 1 October 2016 at 03:35, Doug Gilmore <doug.gilm...@imgtec.com> wrote: > My commit r240439 didn't handle the situation where setting > --param prefetch-latency=0 can cause the prefetch address to > be the same as the original address. In this case, no > copying of points-to information should be done. > > Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux, ok for > trunk? > > Doug I can confirm that your patch fixes the ICE I was seeing. However, the new testcase does not pass on low end architectures: cc1: warning: -fprefetch-loop-arrays not supported for this target (try -march switches) Can you add a guard? Thanks, Christophe
