On Oct 4, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 04/10/16 09:39, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Hi Matthias, >> >>> On 05.09.2016 17:13, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>> >>> still breaks bootstraps when configured with --enable-objc-gc. >>> >>> the immediate step should be to fix the bootstrap failure, as an additional >>> step >>> to remove boehm-gc from the gcc sources and be able to use an external >>> boehm-gc. >> >> the first part is handled by my unreviewed patch >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg02437.html > > Looks obvious to me, fixes bootstrap. I think no-one will complain > if you check it in.
I don't know who wants to review it, but if people want me to, Ok. The idea is that if ObjC is the last remaining user in tree for boehm-gc, then reasonably I'm the last man standing. Of course, if others want to review approve the patch, I'm fine with that. I'm fine with patches to externalize boehm-gc if people want to push that direction.
