On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Jiangning Liu <jiangning....@arm.com> wrote: > PING...
Ok. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- >> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jiangning Liu >> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 5:56 PM >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: [PATCH, testsuite, ARM] change XFAIL to pass for ARM on a case >> testing tree-ssa-dom >> >> Test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c can pass for -O1 after Richard >> Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> fixed something in tree-ssa-dom. The >> "link_error" should be optimized away for ARM targets as well. >> >> The patch is: >> >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c >> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c >> index 45e44a1..470b585 100644 >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c >> @@ -33,5 +33,5 @@ void test55 (int x, int y) >> that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this >> by teaching dom to look through && and register all components >> as true. */ >> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" >> { xfail { ! >> "alpha*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix- >> *-* >> mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*-*" } } } } */ >> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" >> { xfail { ! >> "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* crisv32-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86- >> *-* >> mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* sparc*-*-* spu-*-* x86_64-*- >> *" } } } >> } */ >> /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */ >> >> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >> >> 2011-08-26 Jiangning Liu <jiangning....@arm.com> >> >> PR tree-optimization/46021 >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Don't XFAIL on arm*-*-*. >> >> Thanks, >> -Jiangning >> >> >> > > > >
