Forget it! It seems that I did not apply the patch!-( Sorry for the noise.
Dominique > Le 16 oct. 2016 à 18:42, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> a écrit : > > Dear Jerry, > >> The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call >> abort’. This seems consistent with your comment > > I have not been clear enough: I have to replace 64 with 16 even with your > patch. > > Dominique >
