On 10/20/2016 08:43 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
Nit. I don't think you want a comma after "so". And it looks like your
comment got truncated as well.
With the comment above fixed, this is fine for the trunk.
I'm terribly sorry to have dropped the ball here, but I've committed this
now after not even a year ;-/ (r241374)
It'd totally fallen off my radar. I had to go find it in my archives :-).
Obviously after rebootstrapping
with all,ada languages. I also did some benchmark run which should be
taken with a grain of salt as the machine had fairly variant results but
the improvements are real, though perhaps not always in that range (it's a
normal three repeats run). I'm really curious if our automatic tester can
pick up similar improvements, because if so, it's extreme (5 to 15 percent
in some benchmarks) and we can brag about it for GCC 7 ;-)
Yea. I don't expect it applies that often and ISTM that it's probably
most beneficial by enabling other stuff later in the loop optimizer
pipeline to see more loops without embedded flow control.
ANyway, glad to see it go in.
jeff
