On 21/10/16 15:33 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:58:26PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 21/10/16 14:36 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:53:49PM -0400, Ryan Burn wrote:
> > > Are exception classes required to support emplace new construction
> > > like that? With this change, Intel's TBB library no longer compiles
> > > because its exception class declares it's own new operator (see
> > > https://github.com/wjakob/tbb/blob/master/include/tbb/tbb_exception.h):
> > >
> > Can you test this patch please:
>
> That doesn't help, the overloaded new still prevents placement new.
> Dammit.
>
Hmm, are you sure. This program compiles for me (while fails without ::):
Looks like tbb also compiles and pass tests.
Bah! I didn't include <new> in my test.
I'll make that change, thanks.
#include<new>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct S {
void* operator new (unsigned long size);
};
main() {
void* p = malloc(sizeof(S));
::new(p) S();
}
--
Gleb.
--
Gleb.