On 03/11/16 12:06, Eric Botcazou wrote:
    What's your decision on this?
I think that we ought to standardize on a single order for note copying in the
RTL middle-end and the best way to enforce it is to have a single primitive in
rtlanal.c, with an optional filtering.  Bernd's patch is a step in the right
direction, but doesn't enforce the single order.  Maybe something based on a
macro calling duplicate_reg_note, but not clear whether it's really better.

Thanks for the feedback,  I'll try to work through this.

Regards,
Jiong

Reply via email to