> subreg_offset_from_lsb was supposed to be the inverse operation of > subreg_lsb, which also returns a bit number.
It would have helped the reviewer to state it in the function comment. ;-) > Should I change that to return a byte number as well? Both functions are fine as-is, but mention that the new one is the inverse of the old one in the comment. -- Eric Botcazou
