On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 08:02:08AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:09:24PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > IN_RANGE(POS...) makes sure that POS is a non-negative number > > smaller than UPPER, so (UPPER) - (POS) does not wrap. Or is there > > some case that the new macro does not handle? > > I think it works fine. > > With a name like UPPER, you may want to have SIZE_POS_IN_RANGE work like > IN_RANGE, i.e. UPPER is inclusive then. Dunno.
Yeah, maybe rather call it RANGE to avoid too much similarity. Some name that is so vague that one has to read the documentation. I'll post an updated patch later. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt IBM Germany
